From “beneficiary” to supplier: a live case pattern

Beneficiary to supplier project discussion

For many NGOs, the word “beneficiary” still quietly shapes everything. It suggests a one way flow: resources move from programme to person, then the story is finished. But entrepreneurs and cooperatives who graduate from programmes do not see themselves only as beneficiaries, they are trying to be suppliers.

The women’s soap cooperative that disappeared

Picture a women’s cooperative in Ghana. They complete a six month programme on soap making, branding and basic accounting. During the programme:

Once the programme ends, what happens?

How OpenMarket Global changes the frame

On OpenMarket Global, that same cooperative can move from an invisible “success story” to a named supplier:

  1. The NGO that ran the programme lists a project on the platform, describing what support was given.
  2. Each women’s group is listed as a supplier, with their product (e.g. GlowSoap), location and WhatsApp contact.
  3. Hotels, retailers, clinics or other NGOs can contact them directly to place small orders.

Instead of living only in a PDF line “50 women trained” the cooperative appears in procurement searches like “soap Ghana” or “skincare women led”.

Benefits for all sides

Recommendations for programme designers

To move from “beneficiary thinking” to “supplier thinking”, programmes can:

Why global action should act

The world does not need more one off “women’s empowerment” case studies that end in a PDF. It needs connected, discoverable pipelines of women and youth led suppliers that can be seen by ministries, supermarkets, clinics and investors.

By making the step from beneficiary to supplier explicit and building platforms that support it, global actors can multiply the impact of every training dollar and grant.